Just as playing Major League games in countries other than the US and Canada is - despite what the Yankees may think after their gruelling trip to Japan - a good thing, so is the idea of a baseball World Cup.
Jayson Stark points out that we're still a long way from it actually happening, given that there are so many unresolved questions (which countries should be involved? which players are eligible? where would it be played? etc.), but I like the idea of a truly international competition.
Stark plays devil's advocate in asking why countries such as Italy, China or the Netherlands should be invited to take part, but he answers his own question in a way that couldn't be any clearer if it had come from Beijing or Bologna: "
To ensure that this is a truly global extravaganza and to build the popularity of the sport in those countries."
If you're reading this from the other side of the Atlantic, it might be hard to imagine just how much of a minority sport baseball is here in Europe, for example, and how much work is needed to help develop its appeal and popularity. I can't speak with any authority about Italy or the Netherlands, but I do have some figures from France which give an idea of how minor a sport baseball is over here: in a country of 55 million inhabitants, just 8,000 are registered baseball players (all age-groups combined). I'll do the math for you - that's just 0.0145% of the population, so there is a lot of work to be done.
What I love about baseball is one of the things that might well turn off people who know nothing about the sport - it's the quintessential American sport, filled with subtle rules that often come into play once in a blue moon (you try explaining the infield fly rule to somebody who still hasn't quite grasped the basics of the ball / strike thing...). This means that, even if initiatives were launched to mass-market the sport, most potential fans would be turned off before they even got started. 'Converting' people to what
Annie Savoy called "the church of baseball" is something that can only be done effectively on a small scale, at least here in France.
This is how the conversation usually goes when I speak to friends / colleagues:
Friend: "So, what are you up to this weekend?"
Me: "I'm playing baseball".
Friend: "Baseball? As in...baseball?"
Me: "Yeah."
Friend: "You mean you go to the park and throw the ball around for a while?"
Me: "No, I mean organised baseball."
Friend: "Here in Paris? You mean there are real teams playing in leagues and stuff?"
Me: "Sure. Why don't you come along and check out a game?"
Friend: "Ooooh, I dunno - I won't have a clue as to what's going on!"
Me: "Well, I'll come along with you and explain the rules, so you won't be lost and / or bored..."
And so the friends come along (if the sun is shining) and you know what? They actually have a good time, because it's fun to watch and totally different from anything they've seen before, and with a little commentary from me, they can actually understand more or less what's happening on the field. More often than not, they come back for a second or third look, and tell other friends and colleagues about these eighteen guys they saw chasing a little white ball around a big field, and the whole process is repeated all over again.
As you can see, the gospel is being spread on a very small scale, but, little by little, interest in the sport
is growing (only last week, a free sports-oriented newspaper handed out in the Paris subway featured not one but
two baseball-related articles, one on Barry Bonds and another on the basics of the game), and it needs initiatives such as the World Cup to help it along. As Jayson Stark points out, there's nothing like a bit of patriotic fervour to stir the hearts of sports fans (or even casual observers, as France's triumph in the 1998 soccer World Cup proved), whatever the sport.
All that is required now is for all tricky problems to be resolved...