The Baseball Desert

Thursday, April 28, 2005

Right on time

Can somebody please enlighten me as to why the Blue Jays' home games are always scheduled to start at times like 1:07pm, 4:07pm, etc. I know that start-times are governed by the TV-scheduling gods, but I can't for the life of me work out why the games in Canada are scheduled to start two minutes after those in the US, especially as the games never start at the precise time indicated anyway.

Answers on a postcard to the usual address.

Sunday, April 24, 2005

Zero success

The Cardinals' Larry Walker summed it up nicely:
"It was one of those days where if you paid money for a ticket to come watch, you got to watch something pretty special. For two guys to go out there and battle like that, it was a lot of fun. Not only to watch, but to play in, too."
Clemens has now pitched 23 scoreless innings in his last three starts, but has won none of them. He already has 329 of them under his belt, so it's easier for him to be philosophical about things than most pitchers, but he has to be hoping that Houston's bats wake up pretty soon.

Saturday, April 23, 2005

Day off

It's Saturday - my brain is switched off for the weekend and just looking forward to seeing some good games. The hardest decision I'll have to make is whether to watch Mulder vs.Clemens or see whether Dontrelle can keep the D-Train running, so it's a perfect time to catch up with Jayson Stark's latest Useless Information Dept., parts I and II.
As Kansas City Star columnist Joe Posnanski reports, Royals DHs were batting a terrifying .183 through Thursday, and their cleanup hitters were hitting an embarrassing .141. We're thinking it probably won't make them feel better to know that the Cubs' pitchers were batting .300.
I live for this stuff...

Thursday, April 21, 2005

All's Wells with Boston

Question to Red Sox Nation: Are we ready to start calling him Boomah yet, or not?

Question to Orioles fans: Where the hell were you last night? I presume what I heard on TV were not canned cheers, so how come every time the Red Sox got a hit or retired an Oriole it sounded like Fenway Park out there? Just wondering...

Ain't got the blues

The Dodgers did it again last night, coming from behind to beat the Padres 3-1 at Petco Park. They seem to keep finding someone to keep them in the ballgame long enough to hand things over to the bullpen. In the absence of übercloser Eric Gagne, Yhency Brazoban has been impressive as the Dodgers' closer - in 7 1/3 innings he's given up just 3 earned runs and has struck out 8.

Just one random thought on the game - I've nothing against honouring US military personnel, if that's what clubs want to do, but the idea can get taken a little too far:
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(photo: AP)
Quick - somebody call the fashion police!

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Renaissance man


(photo: Reuters)
Milton Bradley seems to have seized the opportunity that the Dodgers gave him at the back end of last season. It's good to see that the player who threw those tantrums last year is now hearing his manager say this about him:
"Milton very definitely has assumed the responsibility of leadership and with that comes complete consistency with his behavior," [Dodger manager Jim] Tracy said. "He is stepping up big time, and he needs to do nothing further from the standpoint of leadership other than to go out and play as hard as he has played thus far."
The Dodgers are now off to a red-hot 10-2 start and are showing that they're a force to be reckoned with in the NL West.

House-arrest

Well, not really an arrest, but certainly a resolution of the situation. Good call by the Red Sox.

Friday, April 15, 2005

Swing and a miss

This is being talked about all over the place.

Having looked at the replays of the incident, it's hard to tell just what the fuckwit 'fan' in question was trying to do. Maybe we'll find out one day, maybe not, but I would venture to suggest that above and beyond the questions of aggressive behaviour, assault, criminal charges etc. there's a simple baseball question to be asked, so I'll ask it:

Dear fuckwit anonymous 'fan',

If your team is up by one measly run in the eighth inning of a very tight ballgame with two men on base and your catcher hits a ball which bobbles around in the treacherous right-field corner at Fenway, why in God's name would you reach out and try to interfere with the ball / the right fielder [delete as appropriate]? You touch the ball, it's a ground-rule double (rather than the triple Varitek ended up with) and the course of the game is altered. (And don't tell me that one game makes no difference over the course of a season).

With hindsight (oh hindsight - how we love your 20/20 vision), the play didn't alter the outcome of the game, but that's not really the point, is it? No matter how close you are to the action (and in right field at Fenway, you're pretty close) you're still defined as a spectator, not a player. If Joe Torre needs someone new to patrol right field, I'm sure he'll give you a call; in the meantime, finish your beer, piss off and let the rest of us get on with the business of watching the game.

Thanks,
Iain

And here's to you, Mr Robinson

April 15 is Jackie Robinson Day, in honour of a man who changed not just the face of baseball, but the face of society as a whole.

Secret formula

W + W = W.

Thursday, April 14, 2005

Botophucket

None of the photos on the blog seem to be showing up properly (and, for once, it doesn't seem to be a Blogger-related problem). Until such time as they do, let your imagination run wild and fill in the blanks yourself.

Update: Photobucket seems to have disappeared off the face of the earth. If anybody has news of a sighting, I'd be glad to hear about it.

Opening Day, Part IV

Through the magic of the Internet, I've so far seen Opening Day at Yankee Stadium, Citizens Bank Park and Fenway, and tonight will see the final instalment of the saga: the Nationals' home opener against the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Thomas Boswell points out that even after this monumental civic childbirth the franchise's future is as uncertain as that of any newborn baby. But if his enthusiasm and optimism are any reflection of the baseball fans in Washington, we shouldn't have too much to worry about:
On Opening Night, countless people will get what they have hoped for so many years or even decades. With trepidation, a new era begins. Don't worry. It's as unlikely as a quadruple play that we will ever be sorry our wish was finally granted.
So, with a nod to the past and an eye towards the future, we can but wish the new arrival all the best: Allez les Nationals...

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

D-Day

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(photo: AP)
Dontrelle Willis threw his second consecutive complete-game shutout this afternoon, holding the Phillies to just 3 hits, whilst striking out 7. I'm not quite sure what this stat:
[The Marlins] have four complete games, while the other 29 teams combined for two through Tuesday
means in the bigger picture, but it is certainly impressive. The combined pitching line of Willis and Josh Beckett now looks like this:

IP
24 H 12 BB 5 K 20 ERA 0.00

So don't put your money on the Braves (who got trashed by the Nats in Atlanta) just yet. On the strength of the first few games, the NL East promises to be a interesting division this year.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005

Snapshots

I caught occasional glimpses of the Opening Day ceremony from Fenway yesterday - the rest of the time was spent cursing my ISP for the crappy connection I had (probably some kind of punishment from the gods for gloating about being able to watch the ceremony) . There are accounts of the day all over the blogosphere (click on pretty much any Red Sox Nation link on the right), but I'd thought I'd nonetheless add my two penn'th for posterity.

As others have said, it's a story best told in pictures, so here are the images that will always come to mind when I think of yesterday's ceremony (all photos AP):

Absent friends
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Never has one player earned so much love in such a short period of time (with the possible exception of the OC, who couldn't be there because he had a baseball game to win in Texas). It was great to see #31 back at Fenway, if only for a day.

Class act
The Yankees were there in the dugout to watch the ceremony. They weren't always all smiles, but they showed a lot of respect for the Red Sox and for the game of baseball by being present.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Joe Torre - one of the rare Yankees to get a genuine cheer from the Fenway crowd - tipped his cap to Terry Francona as a salute to Tito's historic 2004 season.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Mariano Rivera got an ironic standing ovation from the crowd, but instead of pretending he didn't hear it, he took it in his stride with a big smile and a tip of the cap. He knows the Red Sox own him right now, so he's dealing with it.

At last (but not least)
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
It was a day for thinking about Red Sox players past and present, and nobody represents those two groups better than Johnny Pesky. It was great to see him get his ring and raise the championship banner with Yaz.


In case you missed it, there was also a game played yesterday, which allowed the Red Sox to put the icing on the cake. But, in the end, it was a day that was all about the cake, and it was as sweet as it could possibly be.

Monday, April 11, 2005

Time to go home

For the second time in a week, the Red Sox rallied for two runs in the ninth, only to lose the game in the bottom of the inning. I'm sure Kevin Millar spoke for the whole team when he said: "Get us back to Sox Nation."

Well, they'll be there tonight, for the home opener against the Yankees, and although all of Red Sox Nation will be hoping they can bounce back tonight from an inauspicious 2-4 start to the season, most of the focus will be on the pregame ceremonies, where we'll get to see something that many have waited a lifetime for: the Sox being presented with their World Series rings.

If you're any kind of a Red Sox fan, make sure you put a sweater on, because there are going to be chills in the air.

Saturday, April 09, 2005

Manuelly operated

Now I'm no big league manager, so maybe there's something I'm missing here, but if someone has a reasonable explanation as to why Phillies manager Charlie Manuel - with a one-run lead in the eighth inning and the bases loaded with Cardinals - opted to bring in Aaron Fulz and leave Billy Wagner on the bench, then I'm all ears.

I know about the possible advantages of a lefty-lefty matchup with Larry Walker, but still - Aaron Fulz?? No disrespect to Fulz, but I really don't see why he was on the mound at that point in the game. Wagner pitched in 45 games last year and gave up just six walks; Fulz came in and proceeded to walk in the tying run (Walker) and then the go-ahead run (Pujols).

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(photo AP)
It was as simple as that. Walk, walk, ballgame.

I'm assuming that Manuel was using the old 'don't bring your closer in before the ninth inning' technique. Well, Charlie - check the box score in the paper today. There was no ninth inning!

Oh well, at least Wagner will be rested for tonight's game. Assuming, of course, that he's brought in in time.

Friday, April 08, 2005

In the big inning

On a day when religion took centre stage, I thought it only appropriate that I share with you a link which was posted in yesterday's comments: Opening Day Genesis.
But, God said, the goodness in The Game shall always prevail. As needed, the Lord shall bestow upon The Game a Savior. And the Savior, like the Serpent, can take many forms. The Savior shall remind Fans how blessed The Game truly is. The Savior shall be called by many names, including Cy, Matty, Honus, Big Train, the Babe, Wrigley Field, Fenway Park, Lou Gehrig, Branch Rickey, Jackie Robinson, Buck O'Neil, Hank Greenberg, Red Barber, Harry Carey, Vin Scully, Jack Buck, Satchel Paige, Bill Veeck, Roberto Clemente, Ernie Banks, Hammerin' Hank, Cool Papa, Dizzy, Lefty, Whitey, Stan the Man, Big Klu, the Say Hey Kid, Campy, Duke, the Mick, the Splendid Splinter, the Gas House Gang, the Big Red Machine, the Damn Yankees, Pudge Fisk, Pudge Rodriguez, Yaz, Pops, the Wizard of Oz, Fernando, George Brett, Moonlight Graham, Roy Hobbs, Wild Thing Vaughn, Bingo Long, the Ryan Express, Donnie Baseball, Rickey, Eck, the Big Unit, the Cactus League, Cal Ripken, Tony Gwynn, Camden Yards, Rotisserie Drafts, Web Gems, Derek Jeter, Dontrelle Willis, Vlad Guerrero, and, from the Far East, Ichiro. And, God guaranteed, there are many more to come.

God looked upon His creation and He was very pleased. And God spoke, yelling, PLAY BALL!
Here endeth today's reading. Amen.

Thursday, April 07, 2005

Bargain bucket

This is hilarious.

Re-cycling

Brad Wilkerson made history last night by becoming the first-ever Nationals player to hit for the cycle (for the second time in his career), a feat which helped his team to a 7-3 win over the Phillies. We're still in that early-season mode where almost everything the Nats do is a first something-or-other, but (with apologies to Tom & Tom) it was nice to see them get this crucial one ("first win") under their belt.

The Nats close out the series in Philly tonight. It's another 1:05pm ET start, which will allow me to see my fifth game in as many days. Only in "MLB.TV World" could I get off to a sparkling 5-for-5 start!

The enemy within

My daughters have not as yet caught the baseball bug, but they do like to watch the games on MLB.TV, albeit with limited understanding of the rules (we're just starting on explanations of how you know it's a strike or a ball). Although their tactical understanding is limited, their understanding of baseball allegiances is fairly sharp, and they know who I'm rooting for: les Red Sox...

However, sibling rivalry almost guaranteed that as soon as one of them decided to pledge her allegiance to my team, the other one would go in the opposite direction, just as they do when England play France at rugby or soccer. Which means that we had this scene at the dinner-table this evening:

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(Note the intense concentration on the ballgame in both cases. "Camera? What camera?")

As we all mutually brought each other up to speed on major world events and the high points of the DVD they watched this afternoon, conversation finally turned to last night's Red Sox / Yankees game [translated from the original French by yours truly]:

Zoé: So who won last night - was it the Red Sox?
Me: Well, they almost won, but ended up losing 4-3 right at the end...
Laura: Yes!! The Yankees won! The Yankees won!
Zoé: Shut up! [she clearly gets her stunning repartee from her father]
Laura: Ha-ha - The Yankees won!
Zoé: Daddy - Laura's annoying me. I think that since she's a Yankees fan we should just stop talking to her...

Is it too early to get her one of those 'Kid Nation' memberships?

Update: Zoé, of course, will get to exact her revenge at breakfast tomorrow.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Letter to NESN

Dear NESN,

Having had to sit through three hours of the insufferable Michael Kay on Opening Night in Yankee Stadium, I was delighted to see that MLB.TV was showing the NESN feed of last night's game.

However, please note: if I'm watching the Red Sox broadcast of the game, I don't ever (i.e. between now and the end of time) want to see George Steinbrenner's ugly mug on screen. Unless he's being thrown out of the window of his luxury box.

Thanks a lot.
Iain

Back in the saddle again

Opening Day was great, but its soothing magic wore off fairly quickly, leaving me to ponder the fact that Red Sox fandom has slowly seeped into my bloodstream and turned me into an individual who is not necessarily pleasant to be around at game-time, even if it's only the second game of the season.

Last night I watched the Red Sox tie the game in the bottom of ninth against Mariano "Not-As-Scary-As-He-Used-To-Be" Rivera, only to then see them lose the game on a Derek Jeter walkoff home run in the bottom of the inning. Jeter's blast had me cursing and making obscene gestures at the computer screen, much to the bemusement of Mrs Iain, who was no doubt wondering how I could go from a happy, Zen-like state of mind to raving lunacy in the space of about three days.

What can I say? I think I've got the Red Sox under my skin. The only positive aspect I can see is that I'm not the only one.

Bringing up the rear

If my backside could talk (and do elementary mathematics), this is probably what it'd be saying:

"OK, so it's looks like we're in for another season of MLB.TV. I figure, what, 100, 110 games this year? If we say 3 1/2 hours per game, then we're looking at 350 - 400 hours sat here in front of the screen. So, a friendly word of advice - the dining-room chair isn't going to cut it, I'm afraid. Time to do a little shopping), my friend..."

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

Opening Day thoughts

In no particular order (and possibly of no particular interest, but hey - it's my blog...):
  • I'm still having a little trouble adapting to this particular sight.
  • The sample size may be a little small, but the Tigers' Dmitri Young is currently on pace to hit 486 home runs this season.
  • I really like the Nationals' road uniforms. The gold-trimmed black lettering on the grey background looks good, and I like the juxtaposition between the funky 'W' on the cap and the classic-looking lettering on the jersey:
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
(photo: AP)
It was a good day to be at the ballpark. There was a sense of excitement and anticipation at the games I saw - it's that great time of the year when every fan believes that their team has a shot, if not at the title, then at least at a great season. It won't last, so savour it while you can.

Monday, April 04, 2005

About bloody time!

Haloscan commenting and trackback have been added to this blog.

I came, I saw...

...I was underwhelmed.

The Red Sox's defense of their 2004 World Series title got off to a somewhat inauspicious start, with a 9-2 defeat at Yankee Stadium. The Sox just never seemed to get into the game, either on the mound or at the plate. The Yankees, on the other hand, looked like a ballclub that was hungry to put last season's disappointment behind them and start this one with a bang.

It would have been nice to win on Opening Day, particularly against the Yankees, if only to earn bragging rights for an extra couple of days, but in the greater scheme of things, it's no big deal. Thankfully, as Earl Weaver said: "This ain't football - we do this every day". The history - both ancient and recent - between these two teams meant that tonight's game did have a certain intensity to it, but things will level out in a few days' time, and we can get on with the business of regular baseball, day in, day out, for the next six months. I'm betting that the Sox don't lose the next 161 games, and that the Yankees don't win the next 161 games, and that, come the end of the season, these two teams will be there or thereabouts.

In the meantime, there are other Opening Day games to watch later today. If I can survive my 2am start to the season, I'm going to check out the Phillies and the Nationals at Citizens' Bank Park.

Wherever you are, have a great Opening Day, and enjoy hearing those two words we've waited 5 months to hear: "Play ball!"

Sunday, April 03, 2005

City of Brotherly Love

As the Red Sox and Yankees prepare to resume their long-standing rivalry tomorrow night (and all that it sometimes entails), (dis)honourable mention should be made of Newcastle United teammates Lee Bowyer and Kieron Dyer, who were both sent off during today's English Premiership game against Aston Villa for fighting each other!

Maybe we can wind Gary Sheffield and Randy Johnson up to breaking-point before tomorrow night's game and make the Red Sox' task that little bit easier.

Saturday, April 02, 2005

An ocean of consolation

Thomas Boswell: Why Time Begins On Opening Day (1984)

Why baseball?

Millions of us have wondered. How can baseball maintain such a resolute grasp on us? My own affection for the game has held steady for decades, maybe even grown with age. After twenty-five years of attachment, I have no sense of wanting to be weaned from this habit. What seems most strange is the way so many of us reserve a protected portion of our lives for a game which often seems like an interloper among our first-rate passions. What is baseball doing here, tucked on the same high shelf with our most entrenched emotions?

If asked where baseball stood amid such notions as country, family, love, honor, art and religion, we might say derisively, “Just a game.” But, under oath, I'd abandon some of these Big Six before I'd give up baseball. Clearly, a game which becomes one of our basic fidelities is something more than “sport.” Perhaps the proper analogy is to our other joyous, inexplicable addictions.

A thread runs through all these idle loves. Each, like baseball, brings us into a small and manageable world chocked with intriguing and unambiguous details; we are beckoned into tiny universes where the areas of certainty are large, where the regions of doubt are pleasantly small. The cook must wrestle with tarragon and basil, the gardener agonizes over his pruning. The baseball fan knows every batting average, down to the thousandth of a point. What steady ground on which to stand, if only in one corner of our lives! Each pastime has its own unstated set of values. That part of us which is a fly fisher or a curer of hams or an habitué of the bleachers shares fragments of a common viewpoint with others of the same tastes.

When we meet a bona fide fan – and baseball fanciers can be as snobbish as wine sippers or prize rose gardeners – we start from an assumption of kinship. Implicit is the sense that you endorse a whole range of civilized modern tastes; if you'd lived in the sixteenth century, you would probably have liked Montaigne. By and large, baseball fans tend to prefer pastoral, slyly anecdotal, proven-if-slightly-dated things over those which are urban or pretentious or trendy. We choose the gentle grandstand conversations, beer in hand, on a soft spring night over the raucous forty-yard-line scream, whiskey-in-fist, on a brisk autumn afternoon. Our presumption of comradeship is considerable. Anyone who shares our range of wise opinion must do dastardly deeds to lose our good will.

In sum, what baseball provides is fact. Fact in a butter sauce of tone. Fact as in the sense of detail and correctness. Tone as in style and spirit.

In contrast to the unwieldy world which we hold in common, baseball offers a kingdom built to human scale. Its problems and questions are exactly our size. Here we may come when we feel a need for a rooted point of reference. In much the same way, we take a long hike or look for hard work when we suspect what's bothering us is either too foolish or too serious to permit a solution.

Baseball isn't necessarily an escape from reality, though it can be; it is merely one of our refuges within the real where we try to create a sense of order on our own terms. Born to an age where horror has become commonplace, where tragedy has, by its monotonous repetition, become a parody of sorrow, we need to fence off a few parks where humans try to be fair, where skill has some hope of reward, where absurdity has a harder time than usual getting a ticket.

In those moments when we have had our bellyful of abstractions, it is detail, the richness of the particular, which restores us to ourselves. There are oceans of consolation, seas of restored appetite, in as humble a thing as a baseball season. This great therapeutic wash of fact and anecdote draws us back to ourselves when we catch ourselves, like Ishmael, water-gazing too long.

[...]

Baseball offers us pleasure and insight at so many levels and in so many forms that, when we try to grasp the who sport in our two hands, we end up with nothing. The game, because it is no one thing but, rather, dozens of things, has slipped through our fingers again.

As each season begins, we always feel the desire to capsulize and define the source of the sharp anticipation that we feel as opening day approaches. We know that something fine, almost wonderful, is about to begin, but we can't quite say why baseball seems so valuable, almost indispensable, to us. The game, which remains one of our broadest sources of metaphor, changes with our angle of vision, our mood; there seems to be no end to our succession of lucky discoveries.

When opening day arrives, think how many baseball worlds begin revolving for seven months.

As history, baseball has given us an annual chapter each year since 1869. Each team will add a page to its franchise's epic. Countless questions that attach themselves to the baseball continuum will be answered. Will Pete Rose find a way to break Ty Cobb's record for hits? Will Reggie Jackson get his five hundredth home run? Will Terry Felton – oh-for-sixteen in his career and back in the minors again – ever win a game? Yes, we walk with giants.

As living theatre and physical poetry, the game will be available in twenty-six ballparks on more than two thousand occasions. Baseball is always there when we want it – seven days a week, seven months a year. All the tactile pleasures of the park are ready, when the proper mood strikes us: evening twilights, sundowns, hot summer Sunday afternoons, the cool of the dark late innings of night games, quiet drives home as we decompress and digest.

Then, just when we think the game is essentially mellow and reflective, we find ourselves looped in the twists and coils of a 5-4 barn burner between two contenders. When the centerfielder jumps above the fence in the bottom of the ninth and comes down with the ball and the game in his hand, we realize that two or three hours is just the proper amount of time to tighten the mainspring of tension before letting us explode in one, final cheer. We leave with a glowing tiredness, delighted by the memories of this impromptu and virile ballet, all choreographed by the capricious flight of a ball.

Despite all this, baseball may give us more pleasure, more gentle, unobtrusive sustenance, away from the park than it does inside it.

With breakfast, we have our ten minutes of box scores – enough to travel to thirteen cities, see thirteen games in our mind's eye, note at a glance what five hundred players did or failed to do. Dave Righetti, five walks in four innings, still can't get his delivery in synch. Tony Armas, three for four, out of his latest slump, will probably go right into a streak and hit five homers by next Friday.

On Sunday, the breakfast process takes an extra ten minutes, since The Averages must be consumed. We imagine the state of mind of dozens of players and their teammates. (Who ever thought that Seaver had another good season in him? Kingman's down to .196; bet that bum's a prince to be around.)

Then, in odd parts of the day, the game drifts into the mind. Who's pitching tonight? Is it on TV? At worst, the home team is on the radio; catch the last few innings. “Double-play grounder to Ozzie Smith deep in the hole, Billy Russell's chugging toward first, Steve Sax trying to take out Tommy Herr.”

Why, it doesn't even have to happen to be real.

The ways that baseball insinuates itself into the empty corners, cheering up the odd hour, are almost too ingrained to notice. Tape at eleven, the scores before bed, the Monday and Saturday games of the week. Into how many conversations will Steinbrenner's name creep, so that we may gauge the judgements of our friends, catch a glimpse of their values on the sly? The amateur statistician and the armchair strategist in us is roused. What fan doesn't have a new system for grading relief pitchers, or a theory on why the Expos never win?

Sure, opening day is baseball's bandwagon. Pundits and politicians and every prose poet on the continent jumps on board for a few days. But they're gone soon, off in search of some other windy event worthy of their attention. Then, once more, all those long, slow months of baseball are left to us. And our time can begin again.

Friday, April 01, 2005

Cursed to First to Typepad

Beth has moved, but have no fear:
I want to emphasize that while the mechanical elements of this blog and its Web address have changed, its essential content will not. I will still be writing from the humanistic, literary side of sports, especially baseball, and will still be chronicaling the extraordinary journey of the Boston Red Sox franchise and its fans.

In other words: same time, same place, new channel.
Good news, indeed.

A whiter shade of gray

ESPN is running a great piece by Alan Schwarz on just how difficult it is going to be to untangle the many threads of the steroid accusations and revelations. His specific take is on how what appear to be steroid-inflated records will stand against the 'pure' records of the past. Except that, as he points out, almost every baseball record is in some way a product of its particular age and should be viewed in that context and some Hall of Fame careers - Schwarz mentions Gaylord Perry - have been built on bending, if not breaking, the rules.

Schwarz's mention of Perry is echoed by another ESPN piece, this time by Jayson Stark, who asks himself the tough question of whether, in the light of the loaded non-confessions and refusals to talk about the past during the Congressional hearings earlier this month, he would still be willing to cast a Hall of Fame vote for Mark McGwire. Stark is very clear on Perry's transgressions:
Gaylord Perry was allowed to cheat, wrote a book about cheating, even made a video about cheating. And people not only looked the other way, but thought it was hilarious. So all we could do, when he appeared on our ballot, was vote on what he did on the field -- which was have a Hall of Fame career.
(Even the Hall itself couldn't ignore Perry's violations of the rules - his plaque in Cooperstown all but gives you a nudge and a wink as you read it: PLAYING MIND GAMES WITH HITTERS THROUGH ARRAY OF RITUALS ON MOUND WAS PART OF HIS ARSENAL.)

With McGwire and others, there may be the same kind of suspicion, but Schwarz says that it will be very hard for us to get real proof of anything:

There's no deciding yet how to decipher the mess steroids appear to have made of all the numbers now before us. Too little information is available, and too much might become so in the future. And hard as this might be, every player, regardless of accusation or innuendo, deserves the benefit of the doubt until actual facts are learned, because we would all want that for ourselves.

Nothing is quite as clear-cut as we would like it to be, and it is possible that the whole truth about who was taking what will never come out. In the meantime, we actually have to take to heart what Mark McGwire repeated at least a dozen times during the hearings: in a sense, we're not here to talk about the past. Oh, we will talk about it, but when we do, when we bring up the golden age of the home run - those ten years when records seemed to fall with a mere flick of the wrist - some names will always have a dark cloud hanging over them. The loyal, respectful part of us will want to give players the benefit of the doubt, but it will take a lot of self-restraint to keep from assigning those "mental asterisks" that Schwarz writes about.

Once again it seems that Joe Q. Fan has been led a merry dance and has had his / her heart broken by those that play and run the game of baseball. All that we can do is pick up the pieces and continue to hope that better days lie ahead. I'm with Terence Mann on this one:
This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Ray. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again.
3 days, 1 hour and 49 minutes to Opening Day. Bring it on...